Created
October 14, 2021 17:51
-
-
Save stevoland/39de1421bc64131f5667a65744b8ea96 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
[email protected]: Public comments on SAGO members
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
My comments are related to the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and should be | |
read in the following context: | |
In regards to SAGO, WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus | |
writes[1] “a fully open and transparent scientific process is | |
essential” and that “laboratory hypotheses must be examined carefully, | |
with a focus on labs in the location where the first reports of human | |
infections emerged in Wuhan.” | |
You will be aware that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) is a | |
world-renowned centre of SARS-related coronavirus research, often | |
subcontracting on grants made to EcoHealth Alliance. This or related | |
research could plausibly be the origin of the pandemic. | |
Dr Wacharapluesadee is a subcontractor on a million dollar grant made | |
to EcoHealth Alliance[2]. This is a disqualifying conflict of | |
interest. | |
Dr Yang is an employee of the Chinese Academy of Sciences[3] to which | |
the WIV belongs. This is a disqualifying conflict of interest. | |
Dr Koopmans is the head of a department which collaborates with | |
EcoHealth Alliance[4]. This is a disqualifying conflict of interest. | |
Furthermore, Dr Koopmans, Dr Dedkov, Dr Farag, Dr Fischer, Dr | |
Nguyen-Viet and Dr Watson were members of the joint WHO-China study. | |
Six months after that team reported their findings, the team leader is | |
recorded as saying[5] “In the beginning, [the Chinese counterpart] | |
didn’t want anything about the lab [in the report], because it was | |
impossible, so there was no need to waste time on that.” Rather than | |
report this factually, it seems a private bargain was struck at the | |
last minute. The lab hypothesis could be mentioned in the report “on | |
the condition we didn’t recommend any specific studies to further that | |
hypothesis.” | |
How can the public trust that this new process is to be open, | |
transparent and scientific if these members have previously shown such | |
poor judgement in this very regard? | |
I wish SAGO the best in living up to the fine words of Dr Tedros. | |
Sincerely, | |
[1] https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abm7796 | |
[2] https://theintercept.com/document/2021/09/08/understanding-risk-of-zoonotic-virus-emergence-in-emerging-infectious-disease-hotspots-of-southeast-asia/ | |
[3] https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/public-notice-and-comment-on-proposed-new-scientific-advisory-group-for-the-origins-of-novel-pathogens-(sago)-members | |
[4] https://www.erasmusmc.nl/en/research/departments/viroscience | |
[5] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/08/12/who-origins-embarek |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment