How .NET Standard relates to .NET Platforms

_Platform.cs

using System;

namespace Analogy
{
    // Each interface represents a target framework and methods represents groups of APIs available on that target framework. 
    // The goal is to show the relationship between .NET Standard API surface and other .NET platforms


    // .NET Standard

    interface INetStandard10
    {
        void Primitives();
        void Reflection();
        void Tasks();
        void Collections();
        void Linq();
    }

    interface INetStandard11 : INetStandard10
    {
        void ConcurrentCollections();
        void InteropServices();
    }

    interface INetStandard12 : INetStandard11
    {
        void ThreadingTimer();
    }

    interface INetStandard13 : INetStandard12
    {
        void FileSystem();
        void Console();
        void ThreadPool();
        void Process();
        void Sockets();

        void AsyncLocal();
    }

    interface INetStandard14 : INetStandard13
    {
        void IsolatedStorage();
    }

    interface INetStandard15 : INetStandard14
    {
        void AssemblyLoadContext();
    }

    // .NET Framework 

    interface INetFramework45 : INetStandard11
    {
        void FileSystem();
        void Console();
        void ThreadPool();
        void Crypto();
        void WebSockets();
        void Process();
        void Sockets();
        
        void AppDomain();
        void Xml();
        void Drawing();
        void SystemWeb();
        void WPF();
        void WindowsForms();
        void WCF();
    }

    interface INetFramework451 : INetFramework45, INetStandard12
    {
        // TODO: .NET Framework 4.5.1 specific APIs
    }

    interface INetFramework452 : INetFramework451, INetStandard12
    {
        // TODO: .NET Framework 4.5.2 specific APIs
    }

    interface INetFramework46 : INetFramework452, INetStandard13
    {
        // TODO: .NET Framework 4.6 specific APIs
    }

    interface INetFramework461 : INetFramework46, INetStandard14
    {
        // TODO: .NET Framework 4.6.1 specific APIs
    }

    interface INetFramework462 : INetFramework461, INetStandard15
    {
        // TODO: .NET Framework 4.6 specific APIs
    }
    
    // Mono
    
    interface IMono43 : INetFramework46
    {
        void MonoSpecificApi();
    }

    // Windows Universal Platform

    interface IWindowsUniversalPlatform : INetStandard14
    {
        void GPS();
        void Xaml();
    }

    // Xamarin 

    interface IXamarinIOS : INetStandard15
    {
        void AppleAPIs();
    }

    interface IXamarinAndroid : INetStandard15
    {
        void GoogleAPIs();
    }

    // .NET Core

    interface INetCoreApp10 : INetStandard15
    {

    }

    // Future platform

    interface ISomeFuturePlatform : INetStandard13
    {
        // A future platform chooses to implement a specific .NET Standard version.
        // All libraries that target that version are instantly compatible with this new
        // platform
    }
}

Example1.cs

namespace Analogy
{
    /// <summary>
    /// This example shows that a library that needs access to target .NET Standard 1.3
    /// can only access APIs available in that .NET Standard. Even though similar the APIs exist on .NET 
    /// Framework 4.5, it implements a version of .NET Standard that isn't compatible with the library.
    /// </summary>INetCoreApp10
    class Example1
    {
        public void Net45Application(INetFramework45 platform)
        {
            // .NET Framework 4.5 has access to all .NET Framework APIs
            platform.FileSystem();

            platform.Console();


            // This fails because .NET Framework 4.5 does not implement .NET Standard 1.3
            // Argument 1: cannot convert from 'Analogy.INetFramework45' to 'Analogy.INetStandard13'
            NetStandardLibrary13(platform);
        }

        public void NetStandardLibrary13(INetStandard13 platform)
        {
            platform.FileSystem();

            platform.Console();
        }
    }


    /// <summary>
    /// This example shows a library targeting multiple frameworks and 2 different applications
    /// using that library. MultipleTargetsLibrary needs access to the FileSystem, that API was only available
    /// in .NET Standard 1.3. .NET Standard 1.3 only works with .NET Framework 4.6. Because of this
    /// MultipleTargetsLibrary needs to add support for .NET Framework 4.5 explicitly.
    /// </summary>
    class Example2
    {
        public void Net45Application(INetFramework451 platform)
        {
            // On the .NET 4.5.1 application, the INetFramework45 implementation is choson
            MultipleTargetsLibrary(platform);
        }

        public void NetCoreApplication(INetCoreApp10 platform)
        {
            // On the .NET Core 1.0 application, the INetStandard13 implementation is choson
            MultipleTargetsLibrary(platform);
        }

        public void MultipleTargetsLibrary(INetFramework45 platform)
        {
            platform.FileSystem();
        }

        public void MultipleTargetsLibrary(INetStandard13 platform)
        {
            platform.FileSystem();
        }
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// This example shows how future platforms can be added without the need to change libraries that
    /// target the .NET Standard. JSON.NET targets .NET Standard 1.0 and can run on *ANY* platform that implements
    /// the standard.
    /// </summary>
    class Example3
    {
        /// <summary>
        /// This future platform implements .NET Standard 1.3
        /// </summary>
        public void FuturePlatformApplication(ISomeFuturePlatform platform)
        {
            // You are able to use JSON.NET with the future platform without recompiling JSON.NET
            JsonNet(platform);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// This method represents the implementation of JSON.NET. JSON.NET supports .NET Standard 1.0.
        /// </summary>
        public void JsonNet(INetStandard10 platform)
        {
            platform.Linq();

            platform.Reflection();

            platform.Collections();
        }
    }
}

copy paste screenshot to Powerpoint That should do it on any dev oriented presentation this year :)

@davidfowl Awesome work ;)
But what about netstandard1.6? I think this was added a few days ago and netcoreapp1.0 is now based on that.. NuGet/Home#2536

While this explanation seems to be very clear and concise, there is one thing I don't understand: I currently have a project that targets .Net Platform 5.4 and has a dependency on System.Security.Cryptography.{Algorithms+Csp+Primitives}. My understanding is that I should now target netstandard1.3, but according to my understanding, I only get crypto if I target NetFramework4.5 or higher, and I won't get it with anything that targets core CLR. Is that correct? Something new since dnxcore50 days (when this project was originally created)?

What is the authoritative place that defines what is in what .NET Standard version? Is there a place where I can easily see the differences between two versions? A change history of sorts?

Wow, this is Awesome, In this case we would able to target as many platform we want like UWP or MONO or any standard .net platform.

@davidfowl, thank you.

This is great! Despite watching the ASP.NET community standups every week I think this is the first time it has all clicked for me.

Thanks.

One thought. Shouldn't stuff like .NET Framework 4.5.2 in this visualization be considered classes, not interfaces? That makes more clear the distinction that .NET standard (or rather a version of it) is purely an "interface" that one or more frameworks implement.

Wow ... this was oddly more helpful than normal sentences.

The .NETFramework,Version=4.6 framework represents the available APIs in the .NET Framework 4.6. [1]

Huh....?

The .NETStandard,Version=1.3 framework is a package-based framework. It relies on packages that target the framework to define and expose APIs in terms of the framework.[1]

Wut?
[1] https://dotnet.github.io/docs/core-concepts/packages.html

interface INetStandard10
    {
        void Primitives();
        void Reflection();
        void Tasks();
        void Collections();
        void Linq();
    }

AH. GOT IT. THANKS.

Clicked, thanks! 🤘

Clicked a lot! Thx. Additional explanations from @anurse rocked too!

Clicked. Thanks

@davidfowl Can you give us an update. .NET Standard 2.0 needs an awesome explaination ;)

I guess this has moved to https://github.com/davidfowl/NetStandard/blob/master/platforms.cs ?

FWIW I sent a PR to add 2.0 - davidfowl/NetStandard#10

+1 @adamralph. This is also how I interpreted https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/dotnet/2016/09/26/introducing-net-standard/

Clicked! I love it!

👍

/* IComparable<SemVer>? */
public class INetStandard13: IComparable, IComparable<INetCoreApp10>, IEquatable 
{
}
 
      

This could need an update for .NET Standard 1.6 and maybe 2.0, even if it is not fully baked yet.

The part that still concerns me is the vNext parts.. the fork in the road... let us pick on async/await ... now it's a pretty prolific thing to use in most "modern" .NET code today, however, Unity3D / WebGL, currently can't support this approach to multi-threading... now sure, one can argue "well, sux to be Unity3d and the world moves forward" however, all this does really is cap off a fork in the road, as in order for this to realistically work it needs some incentive or forcing function that encourages all ships to rise with the future tides in a uniform way (no boat gets left behind)... so how does one concede defeat on some areas where it just can't be brought forward due to technical or commercial limitations (lets for argument sake, assert Unity3D can't make task/parallel work because it conflicts with their IL2CPP output) on larger platform adoptees - such as Unity3D ...iOS etc.

The point is there will be commercial realities to face with the platform and how one triages that IF/ELSE statement is where I'm a little gun-shy from PCL abuse.

I find this very clear and concise. Thanks!

This is what I got using "generate class diagram" in visual studio.

It makes more sense now! Thanks!

Click! Click!

What about netstandard2.0?

consider changing "choson" to "chosen" ? :)

Really nice. I would suggest to use concrete classes to represent NetCoreApp10, NetCoreApp11 and the several .NET Frameworks like Net46 and Net47

Makes sense, thanks!